Great topic. Im with many others here. Im looking for the intimacy and the emotional connection that a 1:1 session brings.

A few times Over the years ive been asked if i wanted a double session and have always turned it down. I also dont have any fantasies around this for vanilla sex so that could explain some of it.

Good topic. I think doubles are a different animal all together. Solo sessions provide that calm and connection to reach transcendence. Doubles are more fantasy filled fun. I also agree with what others have said about chemistry. It's usually a good idea to let the lead Domme pick the second, especially if she knows you and your mindset.

There are so many factors. Financial: If you were doing double sessions, would you do as many regular sessions? Focus: If you are focused on yourself it can be more fun, more things happening to you. If you are focused on the mistress either you don't get enough of her, in an unbalanced session, or you might think you are missing on both if the session is balanced. Which is why I think if you do a double session you should record it as well.

I've never pushed for any particular type of session. Men seem to pace themselves with what they want and can afford. Mistress Ayn summed up my preferences in double verses single sessions. It depends on the type of play and the chemistry with the players involved. :-)

Another factor I was not particularly eager to mention is age. I was much more into it when I was younger.

It is funny how that goes. My late husband was a good bit older than me. It hit a few years where he lost all interest in participating in session related activities. Then, one day, he was all about it again as if he was 23 years old. I'm sure it is different for everyone.

You would not believe how naive I was at 23. Not to mention in a country with zero access not only to BDSM but even to porn. Even when I came here I had no idea that this was something you could do in real life until I saw Fetishes. I started too late to have time to lose interest.